Today's New England Journal of Medicine announces that women who are treated with radiation for breast cancer run a higher risk of ischemic heart disease. They claim that's okay because they got rid of the cancer so we shouldn't mind a little heart disease.
But I digress. The heart damage shows up five years after treatment and the risk continues for more than twenty years.
Clearly in the category of what doesn't kill us makes us stronger.
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
New doesn't always mean better
Back in 2007 when I was diagnosed with breast cancer, all the patient boards were talking about this new kind of radiation called 'Mammosite' or brachytherapy. The advantage to it was you went twice a day for one week as opposed to once a day for 8 weeks. I asked my radiation oncologist and she said it was not yet available where I was treated. I was a tiny bit disappointed but figured I could suck it up and cope with daily visits for near 8 weeks. (The biggest pain about radiation treatment is having to go EVERY day for weeks.)
A few years later, I went to a cancer treatment conference at the same hospital and they said they were just beginning to offer this mammosite radiation to selected patients and explained the procedure how beads were inserted during surgery, etc. I felt a faint tinge of regret that I hadn't had the newer treatment type. It was newer so it must be better? Right?
Wrong. Now after it has been used for five years and on more than 50,000 women a clearer picture is emerging..
Often times there are treatment advances and cancer patients look back with regret 'why couldn't that treatment hve been available when I was being treated?' Not this time. No regrets for me.
A few years later, I went to a cancer treatment conference at the same hospital and they said they were just beginning to offer this mammosite radiation to selected patients and explained the procedure how beads were inserted during surgery, etc. I felt a faint tinge of regret that I hadn't had the newer treatment type. It was newer so it must be better? Right?
Wrong. Now after it has been used for five years and on more than 50,000 women a clearer picture is emerging..
- The outcome for patients is not necessarily better for women who have mammosite radiation than regular full breast radiation.
- There is a much higher rate of side effects with mammosite radiation - 35% vs. 18% for regular radiation.
- Mammosite radiation costs twice as much as traditional radiation.
Often times there are treatment advances and cancer patients look back with regret 'why couldn't that treatment hve been available when I was being treated?' Not this time. No regrets for me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)